![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Dear TV Shows: Wait Until WHEN?! Edition
Friday, December 4th, 2009 10:41 amDear "V" and "Flashforward":
Wait... you're not back on the air until March of next year?
OK. This is like having a lukewarm romance with a semi-good-looking person for a short amount of time. Everything's going along well, but not stellar (there are weird problems, like them ignoring your questions about their shadowy pasts, and picking their teeth with the mail), and all of a sudden, BAM~!, they're announcing that they're leaving and won't return for several months hence**. And as you watch the credits roll, you wonder if you're even going to remember them a few months down the line. There are promises, yes, of them showing up with great bouquets of action, excitement, and answers about those shadowy pasts. But the preceding relationship pattern is just meh, so-so enough that you're only a little sad they're gone. If they could just shape up a little bit--kill off some annoying characters, make the meta-plot move a little less like molasses, I would be champing at the bit for their return. But now I wonder if I'll even care about them when March comes around, or if it'll be awkward, like seeing an ex-significant other at a bar when you're with a much more attractive partner and the previous relationship was left horribly unresolved.
Specifically, ( Flashforward )
And also, ( V )
Both of these programs seem to suffer from the writing problems of Star Trek: The Next Generation and Star Trek: Deep Space Nine, where the writers were convinced that they could do deep character episodes fairly early on in the series' progression. What they didn't realize was that character development on an episodic TV show works best after a few seasons of plot have gone by, when the characters have the beginnings of a background that the viewers have "participated in". Stories of "way back when, before the TV show" make more sense when we're actually familiar with the characters and what they're capable of. (It's far more interesting to hear about Sisko's friendship with Dax, for example, when we've seen their relationship build in the present day, or discover Picard's missed relationship with Dr. Crusher when we've seen their rapport grow and change and wondered what, exactly, makes them so familiar with one another.) If the writers could just move the plots along in both of these shows, there would be plenty of time for the ensemble casts to stretch their acting chops later on, when the plot fat has been trimmed and the viewers actually care about the characters.
** To be fair, I knew about the V "one-third now, two-thirds later" approach early on, but I had completely forgotten about it and so was annoyed when I heard about it again all of a sudden this past Tuesday.
Wait... you're not back on the air until March of next year?
OK. This is like having a lukewarm romance with a semi-good-looking person for a short amount of time. Everything's going along well, but not stellar (there are weird problems, like them ignoring your questions about their shadowy pasts, and picking their teeth with the mail), and all of a sudden, BAM~!, they're announcing that they're leaving and won't return for several months hence**. And as you watch the credits roll, you wonder if you're even going to remember them a few months down the line. There are promises, yes, of them showing up with great bouquets of action, excitement, and answers about those shadowy pasts. But the preceding relationship pattern is just meh, so-so enough that you're only a little sad they're gone. If they could just shape up a little bit--kill off some annoying characters, make the meta-plot move a little less like molasses, I would be champing at the bit for their return. But now I wonder if I'll even care about them when March comes around, or if it'll be awkward, like seeing an ex-significant other at a bar when you're with a much more attractive partner and the previous relationship was left horribly unresolved.
Specifically, ( Flashforward )
And also, ( V )
Both of these programs seem to suffer from the writing problems of Star Trek: The Next Generation and Star Trek: Deep Space Nine, where the writers were convinced that they could do deep character episodes fairly early on in the series' progression. What they didn't realize was that character development on an episodic TV show works best after a few seasons of plot have gone by, when the characters have the beginnings of a background that the viewers have "participated in". Stories of "way back when, before the TV show" make more sense when we're actually familiar with the characters and what they're capable of. (It's far more interesting to hear about Sisko's friendship with Dax, for example, when we've seen their relationship build in the present day, or discover Picard's missed relationship with Dr. Crusher when we've seen their rapport grow and change and wondered what, exactly, makes them so familiar with one another.) If the writers could just move the plots along in both of these shows, there would be plenty of time for the ensemble casts to stretch their acting chops later on, when the plot fat has been trimmed and the viewers actually care about the characters.
** To be fair, I knew about the V "one-third now, two-thirds later" approach early on, but I had completely forgotten about it and so was annoyed when I heard about it again all of a sudden this past Tuesday.
