retsuko: (mucha)
[personal profile] retsuko
The new Watchmen trailer is up here at Apple.

It certainly does look good, but then again, any trailer can, with a little snappy editing and some well-recorded theme music. I find two things a bit off-putting, though:

1) The only major star in this picture is Billy Crudup. How will the marketing campaign for the film go, and who will it target, without the obvious draw of a major Hollywood player? I wonder if the studio will go for something incredibly low-key, almost the "instant cult" route.

2) The tag-line "From the most celebrated graphic novel of all time" appears about halfway through. Is "Watchmen" really the most celebrated graphic novel? Of all time? I would argue that while "Watchmen" is a highly influential work, there are other, more beloved works that rightly deserve that accolade. ("Maus" and some of the Tintin books come to mind--but I could still be half-asleep.) And I almost hate to say this, but I have always thought of this work as the book that boyfriends press their comic-disliking girlfriends to read.

But am I crazy? Is this indeed the greatest graphic novel of all time? What does everyone else think?

Date: 2008-07-18 03:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] digitalemur.livejournal.com
I... gotta say I think they might have reason to call it that, as much as anyone can ever make a claim like that. So yeah, sure, the way it's said in the trailer makes it seem oversold... but I think Watchmen does have a claim to being the most acclaimed graphic novel of all time. It really depends on what population you ask, and it's complicated by the fact that Maus is rapidly becoming a high school and college literature class standard, and I don't think Watchmen is. But as much as I love Maus, I do think Watchmen makes a very solid claim of "superhero comics are serious business" which is more daring than how Maus claims that classically-drawn black and white animal-charactered cartooning can be serious business. I think Watchmen's claim is more daring. Even though I enjoy stuff like Maus and Persepolis more than I enjoyed Watchmen.

And I am repeating myself horribly. Sorry.

Date: 2008-07-18 03:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] retsuko.livejournal.com
Well, yes, therein lies the problem: even though Maus tackles (to me) much scarier subject matter and has very difficult passages, I liked it more than what I have read of Watchmen and would rather assign it to a class. I actually taught with it once, to the Vancouver Film School, although that was a very specialized audience right there. And I cannot pin down why this is--I like a lot of Moore's other work (although he's always a little too wordy and it takes me a few pages to get used to his style, every time) and I know he's not wasting my time with pointless subject matter. But there's something about Watchmen where I read a few pages and think, oh, do I have to? Maybe it has to do with the fact that I didn't read a lot of superhero comics as a kid, or buy into a lot of the cape mythology, so perhaps the story resonates less with me. Or maybe, as I mentioned to [livejournal.com profile] orichalcum above, this is a sign that I should sit down and read the entire book!

Date: 2008-07-18 03:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kjpepper.livejournal.com
It is worth doing at least once. It's certainly not my favorite graphic novel by far, and it was difficult to get through, no lie. But I was very glad I had read it by the end.

I'll probably re read it before the movie comes out just cause.

Date: 2008-07-18 03:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] digitalemur.livejournal.com
I had to put it down periodically, but it was very worth reading. And ultimately, it was telling me a story I didn't already know anything about, and talking about moral issues that I hadn't really thought about. That's not true of Maus, I'd already read plenty on his subject material though his characters' experiences of it are radically different quite unique. (I cannot explain my choice of words today. It's really strange.)

Moore takes a lot of getting used to, yes. Speaking of hard to read, but by someone else, have you tried to take on _Transmetropolitan_ yet? That has too much gross-out for me to read much at a time, but I've read about 60% of it. I started with the last volume because I saw the cover art and was compelled (it references a historical event that a lot of people I know were linked to), and then read the first 5 or so, but I bogged down and then I moved and needed to give the volumes back to their owner, etc.
Edited Date: 2008-07-18 03:49 pm (UTC)

Date: 2008-07-18 06:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] retsuko.livejournal.com
OK, due to the two of you, it's definitely going on my list. I suspect that [livejournal.com profile] yebisu9 will enjoy it as well.

I picked up a Transmetropolitan at a book exchange once and really liked the art style, but was rather confused at what was going on, and who exactly the characters were. However, I think I might give that one another try, too. I know Spider Jerusalem is a big-time cult favorite, so it might be interesting to see what the fuss is about.

Date: 2008-07-18 07:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lady-of-mists.livejournal.com
A lot of journalists like Transmetropolitan -- because of Spider Jerusalem in part. I've not read it, so I can't say more. :)

Date: 2008-07-18 08:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] digitalemur.livejournal.com
It really requires reading in order. And it's confusing but amazing.

Okay, I have now seen the Watchmen trailer, and I'm impressed. WOW.

May 2016

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
1516171819 2021
22232425262728
293031    

Most Popular Tags

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags