retsuko: (fierce!)
I'm pretty loyal to most of the shows I watch, and this either has to do with a plot I'm invested in, or characters I care about. However, as I blogged about previously, when a show gets down to *one* character I care about, I'm pretty hard-pressed to keep up with it, and then if a bad plot comes along, it's curtains for the show in general. A case in point is "Dexter", a show which I've been watching on DVD since season 1, but am thoroughly done with now. This most recent season, the fifth one, was rife with plot contrivances, disturbing subject matter (more so than the series' usual fare), and characters behaving utterly unlike themselves. More here, with spoilers. )

In sum: it's a challenging season, and I'm glad it's done now. This break-up was sort of odd, in that I'd read that this season was wildly uneven and knew the basics of the plot going in, but I was still unprepared for the level of squick I found there. I suppose I'd still recommend the first few seasons of the show to people who like that sort of thing, but in general, I think I've had it with serial killers and semi-true-crime TV shows.
retsuko: (spoilers!)
In one of my more first world problems lately, I've found myself in a somewhat awkward position in regards to several of the TV shows I follow: I only like one of the characters on it, and this person isn't the main character. So time spent watching these shows is an exercise in patience, a patience which I don't have much of.

In the case of The Office (the U.S. version), I suspect it's largely due to the slow death of the show as a whole. But it still saddens me to think I find myself annoyed by each and every character, except one. This is an ensemble show, with a talented cast; you would think the writers would have at least one other likable character. Especially since Daryl (the character I like) is one of the few left with an open-ended story line: will he get his act together and ask out the cute woman from the warehouse? Will he decide that he wants to move up in the company? Will he come to his senses and realize he's one of the few smart, down-to-earth people in the office and would be much better served in another job somewhere else? Whatever happens, it's going to make for great comedy and Craig Robinson is such a talented, fun actor that I'm happy to watch. The problem is, when is it his turn? The writers seem fixated on other, lesser concerns, and most of them haven't paid off narratively this season at all. (Jim has gone from being a reasonably funny, somewhat smug Everyman to a sad, more smug EveryJerk, and the plotline with Erin and Andy just hangs on the season like an albatross.) I can only hope that either some other characters become likable again, or that the writers realize that focusing on different characters would make for better episodes.

In the case of Dexter, though, this annoyance is more due to my loss of patience with the serial killer drama genre as a whole. I'm just catching up with Season 5 on Netflix, and it's very, very patchy. On one hand, we have Debra at her awesome, funniest, most vulnerable best. Watching her progression through the series has been a profound pleasure, and seeing her this season makes me wish there was just a show about her, without all the serial killer drama. Because the serial killer drama in Season 5 is... awkward at best, and downright disgusting at worst. Dexter still is a largely sympathetic personality, but his actions this season don't fit his character at all, and the wild consequences of them have been profoundly strange. I keep waiting for the other shoe to drop--there are too many loose ends for the season to end well, for any of the characters. Of course, I don't expect that there's going to be a tidy happy ending all around, but in this case, my suspicions of what's going to happen are keeping me from enjoying the season as a whole. It's like watching someone prepare to do some prank or trick that's going to fail spectacularly, and the person just won't listen to common sense. ("It's gonna be great!" "No, not exactly, are you sure--" "No, seriously, it's gonna rock! Watch this--AUGH!") This used to be the one serial killer/police procedural I could reliably watch without feeling this way; now it's moving into a darker, less entertaining territory. If only the writers could take their expertise with Debra and apply it to the series as a whole. I don't want to be watching for just one character, because that's not going to bring much fulfillment.
retsuko: (they wrote whut?!)
Jin and Mugen pretty much sum up my reaction to the works below, although I'm not quite as appalled as they are. :)

In Books:

Night Child & A Flash of Hex, by Jes Battis: It's a pleasure to read a series of books set in a city I know well, and Battis has a light touch with his descriptions of Vancouver. For me, mentions of the Downtown East Side and Kitsilano are more than name-dropping and his descriptions of the neighborhoods are spot on; for a reader unfamiliar with the city, the same descriptions are never labored or distracting. The concept for these books (occult CSI!) sounded cheesy at the outset, but it works well, and I like the main characters very much. Science and magic mix very, very well in these books, and it's clear that Battis has done his homework on crime scene investigation techniques. It all pays off in a very neat, exciting package. New readers should beware, though: the descriptions of the gore in these pages spare no expense. (The violence is never sexualized and the main character's reaction to it is often what I suspect mine would be, given the circumstances.) Still, the gore's not the major part of the plot, and the rest of the books are well worth the read.

Catching Fire & Mockingjay, by Suzanne Collins: Insert your own Capslock of Spoilery Flail here and click only if you don't mind having the entire series spoiled for you. )

Spoiler-y discussion aside, I can say that I really did enjoy these books, and I do recommend them to all and sundry. They're shelved in Young Adult, but these are books for very mature young adults, and I see no reason why adults won't gain from reading these as well. I only hope now that rumors of a feature film vanish. There is no way to make this movie and do the book justice, not without an R rating, which will bar the much-sought-after kid audience. Honestly? I'm not sure I want to see it in movie form anyway.

On DVD:

Dexter, Season 4: Not since I read Graceling (by Kristin Cashore, last blogged about here) have I wanted a villain to die quite as much as I did when we watched this season. And it's a testament to all of the actors involved in the show that I cared as much about all of the characters as I did. Having said that, I knew a MAJOR SPOILER going into this season, and watching the show with that knowledge in mind certainly changed the experience. More, with me dancing around this spoiler as best as I can, although I make no promises... )

On reading/watching disturbing material, in general: A while back, when I was in a very depressed state, I obsessively read Perdido Street Station, by China Mieville, which is a book that I really, really love, despite its very disturbing imagery and plot. (My bargain with myself at the time was that I would read the book anywhere but in my bedroom, lest the images take root in my dreams.) When I mentioned the book to my therapist at the time, she got that "concerned therapist face" on, and suggested that perhaps I shouldn't read disturbing material when I was trying to sort out my mental turmoil. "But it's so good!" I protested. And that's what I find with the books and TV shows above: they're disturbing as all get out, but they're too damned captivating to put down. There's a thin line between escapism and fetishizing a dark mental state, and I like to think I know myself well enough to realize when I have to put a book down/turn the TV off. But there's a strange thing that I notice lately, which is my genuine interest in said dark/disturbing material. I suppose part of this is my brain wanting examples of how best to deal with bad situations so that I can cherry pick solutions and coping strategies. But another part of it involves perspective. You'd think that just looking around or watching the news would provide that: there's bad crap going on all over the world, but seen through the two-minute news bite, it's way too big to comprehend. Books and TV episodes provide me with enough depth to develop these ideas, but in a finite package, and perspective, when presented that way, is more easily digestible. My life may have scary challenges, but at least I don't have a Dark Passenger goading me into murder, or life and death choices presented to me every thirty seconds in an arena of death for the sake of a government-sponsored reality show. I couldn't articulate this my therapist at the time, but I firmly believe I'm not doing anything unhealthy by seeking these things out, then or now.

That said, my next book choice will definitely involve happy puppies and no one getting hurt. ^-^;;

May 2016

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
1516171819 2021
22232425262728
293031    

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags